YEAH DAWGS
I have never hear anything so dammed preposterous in my life , See Lowe was only ever feasible in the addled brains of Hitler and his sycophants
Barges/landing craft
The use of Rhine barges were the dumbest part of the sealion fiasco , flat bottomed and un powered they were unsea worthy , slow . and critically
there were never enough to land a force sufficient to do anything but die pointlessly .
and their conversion to troop carriers , and assembly at channel and north sea ports simply put them in the bombsights if RAF strikes and more
vitally , deprived German commerce of a vital logistics recourse .
nor did the Luftwaffe ever have enough transports for any meaningful airborne assault [ even ignoring the RAF defences and AAA , they simply could
not perform a heavy enough lift ]
The royal navy
The “ plans “ for sea lion never addressed the issue of how to prevent the RN turning their invasion fleet to fish food . Towed Rhine barges were
the worst possible “ solution “ to the problem of how to leap the channel . One proposed RN tactic was simply perform “ drive bys “ @ 30kt
with RN destroyers , Ramming , swamping and capsizing the hapless barges with their wash – aswell as running over the tow cables .
Any troops that did make it to shore – faced a boom of flaming petrol – and planned barrage of mustard gass pumped through pre placed pipes .
That’s before he encountered the British army
Luftwaffe capabilities
The Luftwaffe lacked armour piercing bombs , without which any credible attack on RN capital ships would have been futile
More critically they lacked any experience and training in anti ship bombing , or torpedo bombing .
Nor for that matter did they have strike aircraft suited to maritime attack available in anything like the numbers required .
air superiority/the RAF
Despite many reams written claiming that they were , The Luftwaffe was not “ close “ to defeating the RAF .
11 group was taking a hammering , but at the same time 12 and 13 groups were growing in strength . We [ British ] always had reserves in hand , and
should an invasion ACTUALLY have occurred – these would have been thrown forward .
Additionally , Aircraft production [ British ] was increasing at a faster rate than losses
The RAF – LOST 1065 aircraft during the BoB , compared to 1922 lost by the Luftwaffe . for the same period . In comparison RAF serviceable
strength rose , allbe it slightly – where as Luftwaffe numbers fell in all areas . [ measured from march 1940 to December 1940 ] . Luftflotte 2 & 3
had losses < 50% operational aircraft available
On only 5 days between July and October did RAF loses exceed those of the Luftwaffe
Lastly , bomber command was growing in strength daily – and performing search and destroy raids targeting suspected supply dumps , ports and barge
flotillas
Also bomber command had plans in hand to attack both a seaborne invasion fleet , and the beachheads , should an invasion materialize
spies/infiltration
The Nazis spectacularly failed to infiltrate their trained agents destined for their spy rings based in England , But you want to believe that they
could hide 100 combat troops in a barn
What possesses people to conclude that infiltration in company strength would some how succeed ????
In allied experience , EVEN single agent , and small squad infiltration only worked in occupied countries : such as the Benelux countries , Norway ,
France , Czechoslovakia etc etc
Why?? , because the indigenous populations had significant pro active allied elements , and a bigger percentage would would simply turn a blind eye
to anti Nazi activity
Germany was a totalitarian state where enemy agents were unwelcome – and thus only a handful of CRITICAL missions were even attempted . most
notably the recce missions for the plots to assassinate Hitler .
Likewise , The UK – though still headed by a democratically elected government – has enacted such measures as the WAR POWERS ACT [ 1940 ] and
Most important , had a universally hostile population , German airmen and POWs who managed to abscond from their camps Found no aid or succor in
England .
land use/rationing
The useage of EVERY acre of land in the UK was subject to review by various bodies , most notably the ministry of production .
The UK was at war , an obvious point – but one which needs stating . Vigilance was the watch word , ARPs , home guard etc were expected to know
their area – and report ANYTHING out of the ordinary to the authorities . A barn capable of being used as a barracks for 100 could not be “
hidden in plain sight “ As for being painted bright red – ROFLMAO . we had black outs , ripped up road signs , to camouflage and deception
measures at every level to foil our enemies . And you want to posit that a network of bright red barns was just ignored ???
This reply to such a silly notion is getting far too wordy , so I will end here .
In conclusion :
Most teevee “ historical documentaries “ are pure sensationalist garbage
Deny ignorance
Read books : by - Foot , Chirchill , Keegan , Clarke, Hastings . to name but a few
I challenge anyone who cares to research it , to cite a credible reference for this “ red barns “ nonsense . any takes ?
APE OUT .