It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bih
attack against Iran would be an attack against all muslims
Originally posted by Toadmund
And the big thing, why the heck is the US picking on Iran about them acquiring nuclear power when Iran has not gone out and attacked anybody?
Originally posted by Toadmund
Question, what nation has the most nukes and actually used them on foreign soil?
Originally posted by zurvan
Originally posted by bih
attack against Iran would be an attack against all muslims
Hey there, care to elaborate on this comment?
Maybe I should ask my question differently: So was the War on Afganistan and Iraq and Palestine and what ever will happen next. So your point is?
Maybe the message you need to take is: What the .... is wrong with Islam to be
A) So much hated that is under attack?
B) So useless that can not defend itself?
out.
Originally posted by ShadowXIX
Originally posted by Darkmind
Neither the US nor the UK have the forces available to invade Iran. It's just not possible.
Why would the US or UK even have to invade? Iran's nuclear program could be crippled with air power alone. There wouldnt be a need to put a single boot on the ground to stop Irans nuclear program.
But if it really came down to it the US clearly has the forces to invade Iran its called a draft and some 300 million people to pick from. The US fought two much stronger powers at the same time during WW2 and could do so again.
Iran is banned from developing or aquiring nuclear weapons under international law. The US along with UK, France, Russia and China are not and are allowed to have them. Other nations such as Israel, India etc.. never signed the NPT and are thus not bound by its laws.
Originally posted by Vitchilo
So if Iran withdraw from the NPT will you stop saying this? And then you'll have no more reasons to attack Iran.
Originally posted by bih
fought what? first of all they didnt attack germany alone how you say,and second they had trouble fighting in vietnam thats why they used nuclear weapons
Originally posted by bih
if they fought alone against germany back then the germans would crush them
:
Originally posted by zurvan
And for your sake I hope we don't Now the question is are you smart enough to understand what i mean?????
Originally posted by bih
fought what? first of all they didnt attack germany alone how you say,and second they had trouble fighting in vietnam thats why they used nuclear weaponsif they fought alone against germany back then the germans would crush them
Article IV
1. Nothing in this Treaty shall be interpreted as affecting the inalienable right of all the Parties to the Treaty to develop research, production and use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes without discrimination and in conformity with Articles I and II of this Treaty.
2. All the Parties to the Treaty undertake to facili-tate, and have the right to participate in, the full-est possible exchange of equipment, materials and scientific and technological information for the peaceful uses of nuclear energy. Parties to the Treaty in a position to do so shall also co-operate in contributing alone or together with other States or international organizations to the fur-ther development of the applications of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, especially in the territories of non-nuclear-weapon States Party to the Treaty, with due consideration for the needs of the developing areas of the world.
Originally posted by bih
Im saying how many countries had to fight germany in order to win WW2? and hes saying US smashed germany back then