It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: charlyv
a reply to: midicon
Just who is denying ignorance with a statement like that?
Graham Hancock has been responsible for supplying much of the content talked about on ATS, since it has been online.
Graham Hancock is a hero of free speech and one of the worlds greatest authors. He is also one of our most diligent scientific and historical investigators. He will be remembered long after this place is forgotten, for sure, and deserves respect.
Graham Hancock deserves no more respect than any other liar. Less, if you ask me (depending on the liar.)
originally posted by: bluesfreak2
Graham Hancock deserves no more respect than any other liar. Less, if you ask me (depending on the liar.)
You forgot (or avoided) to answer my question on whether you agree that Hancock should be banned from physically visiting sites , as he was with serpent mound, Gobekli Tepe and because of Hawass’ string-pulling , also Egypt itself .
originally posted by: bluesfreak2We are all still waiting for you to publish your detailed rebuttals of Hancocks work ; your best-seller-in-waiting.
Oh wait , who would you publish to? It couldn’t be peer reviewed academically, as you are a pretend pseudo-academic.
We are still waiting for your record breaking Netflix documentary , again, rebutting Hancocks work , seeing as you are so knowledgable, influential, and well respected in the field .
Oh wait , you aren’t ; you’re just a nobody , like us lot, who visits ATS.
originally posted by: bluesfreak2You defame Hancocks character on here as it’s easy to do .
We all know why you don’t have the balls to to publish, we all know you yourself have never done any real academic research , we all know you parrot the work of others , we all know you talk from a position of authority when you have none at all , we all know why you come here, and it’s not for debate .
We all know what you are, Harte .
Hancock was never banned from any of those sites. Don't fall for his disgusting crybaby routine.
Hancock has never done any real academic research, and does nothing but parrot the work of others, whom also have never done any academic research. In fact, Hancock actively ignores the research of academics, and suppresses it in his copy and paste books. I have said the same on Hancock's own website. You want me to have him over to my house so I can look him in the eyes and tell him?
At an isolated site 80 meters upstream lies a lean-to shelter dug into an embankment. An estimated 2,300 clay figurines of various animals were found in and around the remains of a kiln. It may be one of the first instances of a covered oven, hot enough to fire clay. Most of the figurines were broken and found in fragments. General consensus agrees that they were likely intentionally and perhaps ritualistically broken, but offers no conclusive reason.One hypothesis posits that these figurines had magical significance, and were intentionally fashioned from wet clay so that they would explode when fired.