What if the government offered a free vasectomy to curb the population?

originally posted by: Brotherman

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: Brotherman

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: Brotherman
a reply to: TheLieWeLive


If the government wants to operate on my wiener I draw the line, with FMJ sent with extreme hate and discontent.

That would be your cajones and not your wiener .

You believe the government knows the difference between their ass and a hole in the ground?

No .
But I do believe a doctor does .

Apparently with current free government medical programs trained professionals do not know the difference between saline solution and gene therapy vaccines. I remain skeptical.

I heard that .
But vaccines coming from the US government do not get thoroughly checked by medical staff.
Yet someone caught it .

ETA : wasn't that Japan ?

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: Brotherman
a reply to: TheLieWeLive


If the government wants to operate on my wiener I draw the line, with FMJ sent with extreme hate and discontent.

That would be your cajones and not your wiener .

Whats the vas difference?

a reply to: TheLieWeLive

But I am paying for it with my taxes, so no.

To clarify, I see the idea but there are too many ethic, moral and other downsides for me. I would not support such a program.

originally posted by: TheLieWeLive
a reply to: SwampFox999

The age of 25 was just me wondering a good stopping age. The programs wouldn’t be for someone who had all the children he wants and then decides to use the service, that’s one reason I stayed low with the age.

Male children should have vasectomies and it should be reversed at age 27. Women over 25 should be sterilised with a pill.

No radical surgery for the wimen, no stress for the men.

Pay no one anything.

a reply to: Dalamax

Vasectomies are not easily reversed and are not always successful when they are.

a reply to: ThatDamnDuckAgain

I understand, It’s not for everybody and it’s not intended to be. I figure if they do not want children it’s opportunity not to burden the rest of the world wi the a child they won’t care for.

So?

I don’t see any problem with that at all.

a reply to: TheLieWeLive

Isn't this for free on demand in most countries at government hospitals or clinics?

I think it is in South Africa if you don't have medical aid or access to private hospitals.
avssa.org.za...

You won't get paid though.

Also male circumcisions, which a few years ago were once part of public anti-HIV/AIDS campaigns (but since it only offers some protection in that respect for heterosexual males - you know those people who rarely matter to gender activists - you don't hear much about it anymore, but I'm sure it's still available on demand, also to forgo the risks some young men face at tribal circumcisions during initiation ceremonies).

Although whether you'd trust South African state hospitals with your willy is another matter.

Too late......

Had mine done on a Friday afternoon in 1986, Monday morning we threw the lines and hauled 300 lobster traps. 😎
Think todays soy-boys would pull that off?
I’m thinking not many.....just sayin.
Wait for it——————


a reply to: rickymouse

originally posted by: PiratesCut
Had mine done on a Friday afternoon in 1986, Monday morning we threw the lines and hauled 300 lobster traps. 😎
Think todays soy-boys would pull that off?
I’m thinking not many.....just sayin.
Wait for it——————


a reply to: rickymouse

I went to my appointment at my doctor three days after my surgery. He looked at my nuts and said it was a success, with the size of my swollen nuts, even if the operation was not a success, he said I probably wouldn't have to worry about getting anyone pregnant again. Having a lot of balls is not always good. It took like another week and a half for the swelling to go down after mowing the lawn an hour after the surgery was finished. Not the smartest thing I ever did. But, I didn't die, whatever doesn't kill you just makes you stronger is the excuse I was taught.

a reply to: TheLieWeLive
Hasn't that been tried intermittently in India? It would be a good idea to explore India news channels and see how that's been working.

But ... but ... but,

What about the little fellas (you know).

If you block the pipe where do they go?

a reply to: TheLieWeLive

That would make much more sense than the nutty theories I've seem. Many people would willingly go for that. Especially if they advertised it as "reversible".

Jeez, why jump straight to a vasectomy?

If the government lent a hand here and there it would be groovy too.

And today's prize is a ... vasectomy!

Don't all clap at once hey.

Govt should offer $1000 to either sex who cuts the tubes ages 18-50

a reply to: rickymouse