a reply to:
March of the Fire Ants
ll this talk of the mandella effect makes me think of the water cycle and various routes a river may take to the sea. Sure we can elaborate but it's
all there and in many other places.
What does this have to do with Mandela Effect?
I can't see the connection.
Now to contradict myself completely -
Great - you weren't confusing enough before doing that.
If Cerns purpose is to create a traversable framework of parallel realities, could the many nuclear explosions of the 20th century have in some way
contributed to the.. mess?
There are no nuclear explosions. It's more logical (Occam's Razor) for TPTB to easily and hastily scare and CONVINCE people TPTB has these
'superweapons' that can't be proven, because it'd be too dangerous due to the ALWAYS DANGEROUS RADIATION (although it has been proven that radiation
can be very healthy, Chernobyl's animal and plantlife COULDN'T be more blooming and successful, Hiroshima and Nagasaki are PROSPEROUS cities with
amazing hustle and bustle, no dangerous radiation whatsoever!)..
When you look at those 'proof' videos, all you see is a sunset filmed badly, some weird artifacts (smoke lines?) next to big dynamite/firebomb
explosions, firebombed cities, and clouds that DO NOT MOVE AT ALL right at the center of a 'superweapon' (nuclear bomb) supposedly exploding, weird
clout artifacts and parts that seem to have spliced together weirdly, etc. etc. Those videos look SO ridiculous and fake, I can't believe that people
actually saw them and were convinced of anything more than a bad cameraman with some trickery.
I mean, think about it - which is more likely? That very difficult-to-make, super dangerous superweapons that can end the whole world with the press
of a button exist, but CONVENIENTLY can't be proven because it'd be too dangerous - - OR that TPTB just fabricated that lie so they could control
people with that kind of Psy-Ops easily?
Hmmm? A weapon you don't have to prove the existence of, so people will have to take your word for it.. and old, fake-looking footage, photos of
firebombed cities (they look identical to other firebombed cities) is supposed to be enough for people to just .. believe?
I don't buy it. I am not saying I know 100% sure one way or another, but all I am saying, it's pretty hard official story to swallow without proof.
Kill me with a nuclear blast, then I'll be convinced it's all real.