World Population Pin Number is 1114

With so many theories and conspiracies about world population I thought I would have a discussion on it and throw some statistics that may or may not align with popular view points. We have people that suggest humans will be 20 billion in 100 years and on the other side of the coin it is suggested that that NWO ultra rich want to greatly reduce the population down to earth friendly numbers, and though I can't speak for the secret societies I can say we will never be 20 billion and the NWO theories are messing in the wrong parts of the world if they want to force human population reduction.

Now to the pin number...

1114 represents billions of people in Americas 1, EU 1, Africa 1, and Asia 4. In 100 years that pin number will be 1145 for the max human population potential of 11 billion. Right now we have peaked at the top of the curve for children ages 0 to 15 in the world at 2 billion, and in 100 years there will still be 2 billion children with this number now staying flat unless further drastic changes happen. Those changes would not be good because reducing births just means the population ages and you end up with a lot more older people than young.

Today the average birth rate is 2.5 children and that is seen as a constant number from now on. Education, cost, needs, birth control etc have reduced birth rates from 6 to the 2.5, so there isn't much further room for reduction in this area. Children today have a high 98%+ chance of living past childhood, so that number has finally peaked very close to max and is now also static.

The question is why do we get to 11 billion and stop in the first place? A part of the growth is because there will be more people in the 15 to 65 age range and that is the area that has not peaked yet. Since we have finally peaked at 2 billion children that number will continue to grow the middle age range every 15 years until we hit 10 billion world wide, and at that point the 2 billion and 10 billion will become constant numbers as we hit the top of the population curve based on births. The extra 1 billion will because we are living longer and longer. In 1700 average life expectancy was 35 years, in 1800 it was 38 years, industrial age got it to 45 years in 1900, 1980 it was 56, and today it is 72. In 2100 it is expected to be 83 and so 1 billion more people.

What we see now is the Americas and EU have already peaked and so today they are 1 billion each, in 100 years they will still be 1 billion each. Asia is close, but is still growing and it will go from the 4 billion today to 5 billion in about 30 years and then it will be at it max too. Africa is the kicker here where many countries there are still having high birth rates of 6, but high children deaths of 30% or more, and low life expectancy at about 61... Funny how Africa is still better than the world was in 1980, but they have a huge amount of growth still until they peak at the top of the curve. This will take them from 1 billion to 4 billion in about 60 to 80 years.

Voila, this is what our future looks like. Americas and EU will be but only 20% of the world population and will become the minorities. When we look at NWO just where are they looking to make the cut? It is not as clear as people might think since once all for areas peak we become constant unless massive chances happen like pandemics, catastrophic events etc... If the NWO decided to cut the population down to 1 billion then we are no longer at the peak and so growth would start all over again, so unless they are looking at culling the heard every 100 years it will just keep going and we will be back to 11 billion at some point in the future.

Thoughts?

Don't worry about that high number of humans in a hundred years, the pharmaceutical companies will cut those numbers down to a third and profit dearly from doing so. The medical industry has weakened the immune systems of many people, someone will create a virus that will kill off a lot of people, most who have a vaccine suppressed innate immune system.

originally posted by: rickymouse
Don't worry about that high number of humans in a hundred years, the pharmaceutical companies will cut those numbers down to a third and profit dearly from doing so. The medical industry has weakened the immune systems of many people, someone will create a virus that will kill off a lot of people, most who have a vaccine suppressed innate immune system.

We will see but we keep living longer... If life expectancy starts to drop from the 72 then you might have a point, but so far people living longer is proving this all wrong.

a reply to: Xtrozero
The problem with going by life expectancy is that it is mostly controlled by child mortality rates. In the past life expectancy was only that low due to high early life mortality, however if you lived to adulthood you likely lived to be much older. The massive growth of populations in Africa is mostly due to increased childhood survival. Modern medicine also has the greatest impact on childhood survival, and the least effect on actually extending lifespans once early life survival rates are negated. It is a classic case of survivorship bias

en.wikipedia.org...

Edit: Found a good visualization of the data
Gapminder Tool

originally posted by: dubiousatworst
a reply to: Xtrozero
The problem with going by life expectancy is that it is mostly controlled by child mortality rates. In the past life expectancy was only that low due to high early life mortality, however if you lived to adulthood you likely lived to be much older. The massive growth of populations in Africa is mostly due to increased childhood survival. Modern medicine also has the greatest impact on childhood survival, and the least effect on actually extending lifespans once early life survival rates are negated. It is a classic case of survivorship bias

en.wikipedia.org...

Agree, that is why we are still growing to 10 billion as we have maximized survival rates for kids while stabilizing birth rates. The extra billion will be the 11 years extended on our average life.

This is what Hans Roslin says. Did you use his numbers? If not check him out. His book 'Factfulness' is good.

Info

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: rickymouse
Don't worry about that high number of humans in a hundred years, the pharmaceutical companies will cut those numbers down to a third and profit dearly from doing so. The medical industry has weakened the immune systems of many people, someone will create a virus that will kill off a lot of people, most who have a vaccine suppressed innate immune system.

We will see but we keep living longer... If life expectancy starts to drop from the 72 then you might have a point, but so far people living longer is proving this all wrong.

And what about opiates?

a reply to: IndyFront

The amount of people dying from opiate overdose is a minuscule fraction. It would have to be increased to the power of millions before it would impact population figures or even life expectancy figures.

According to 2017 figures 72,000 dies of drug overdoses in America (all drugs not just opiates), that's just 0.02% of the population. Which is 0.0009% of the world population.

Doesn't have any meaningful effect.

DB

originally posted by: IndyFront

And what about opiates?

Opiates, GMO, Chemtrails, vaccines, chemicals ETC ETC We are still living longer and longer...