It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Antipathy17
I came across a video on WSHH just a few moments ago where a CNN reporter is talking to an HLN reporter about Morgan Freeman's horrendous actions during her CNN interview with him. The CNN reporter starts by saying as soon as Freeman entered the room he was being sexually suggestive. She shows "evidence" of Freeman doing just that. Thing is, nothing about it seems sexually suggestive to me. Freeman responded to michael caines comment about congratulating a fat woman on her pregnancy. She says he eyes wandered. My question is, if they did, why? The only reason possible in her mind is sexual suggestion. To me if this is her evidence that anything sexual happened, she needs to be disregarded.
www.worldstarhiphop.com...
originally posted by: Antipathy17
a reply to: Antipathy17
Old news?
The lawyer’s letter says:…
“at just this early stage, our review confirms that:
• Of the three people CNN identified as being a “victim,” the first, CNN’s own Chloe Melas, had no reasonable basis to have interpreted what Mr. Freeman said or did at the Going In Style interview last year as having been directed at her or as any form of harassment. The videotape confirms that his statement had nothing to do with her and was not harassing. And an independent third party, the Warner Bros. Human Resources Department, investigated her claim and concluded that it was not supported by the facts.
• The second person CNN identified, Tyra Martin, has gone on record twice since CNN published the article to state that CNN misrepresented what she said to CNN and that Mr. Freeman did not harass her • The third person CNN identified, Lori McCreary, told CNN that Mr. Freeman never harassed her. And as to CNN’s gratuitous sideswipe at Ms. McCreary herself, yet another independent party investigated the claim when CNN raised it, and found it to be meritless.
• Ms. Melas baited and prodded supposed “witnesses” to say bad things about Mr. Freeman and tried to get them to confirm her bias against him. Thus, no reader of the article can have any confidence that any of the anonymous sources, which make up the balance of CNN’s article, can be relied upon at all.
Based on those facts, and the additional information presented below, it is clear that CNN has defamed Mr. Freeman. CNN has inflicted serious injury on his reputation and career. At a minimum, CNN immediately needs to issue a retraction and apologize to Mr. Freeman through the same channels, and with the same level of attention, that it used to unjustly attack him on May 24. CNN also needs to retract the portions of the story that concern Lori McCreary and apologize to her for defaming and injuring her.”
originally posted by: MisterSpock
World star hip hop? I thought that was just a bunch of videos about crackheads smashing stuff. Didn't think anything of actual substance existed on there.