Scenario's

Ok what I am going to present is a particular scenario and as a result I will need to present the conditions.


In this scenario the direction humanity has taken resulted in a condition where every person on Earth ended up related to each other to the extent, we were all 1st cousins.

By that I mean every last one of us upon our home we call Earth.

Any thoughts?

originally posted by: Kashai
Any thoughts?

NOTICE: AboveTopSecret.com management is now enforcing new standards for the opening posts of threads.

Opening posts that contain minimal content, links with little or no explanation, YouTube videos with no commentary, images with little or no commentary, and similar nominal content may be removed without warning or explanation. If your topic is important to you, make sure you explain why, with links and supporting material so that our members may offer more relevant contributions, and ultimately, better threads. In fact, if you have less to say than this simple notice, then you probably do not have enough to start a new thread. Thank you for your assistance in helping to create great threads on ATS.

a reply to: Kashai

"Any thoughts?"


Nope. Not one. You have succinctly explained the whole mystery.

a reply to: Kashai
God that's awful Cuz!... does that mean I married our first cousin?

a reply to: Kashai

So, where is the scenario? Where are the conditions? How can we discuss if you state you will present these, and then don't?

That's a bit of stretch there , 1st cousins? We're closer than that. Well according to the bible anyway.
Think about this, Adam and Eve were the first humans on the Earth. They had 3 sons, Cain, Abel and Seth. Now for humanity to start expanding these people MUST have had children with Eve as there wasn't any other female humans on Earth.
SO where do we all come from then?
That's really tongue in cheek sarcasm there. Think about it, cos that's what the bible thumpers don't want to answer.

a reply to: LadyGreenEyes


What are the chances that within the next 1000 years or less. It would be possible for all peoples due to constraints in precreation across race, creed or color becoming related to that point?

a reply to: MaxTamesSiva


LOL!!


There is historical significance to this, more than often reflected in the sense of the Elites. This where royal families only reproduced with other royal families and there came a time when they all became related to that extent.

originally posted by: Aliensun
a reply to: Kashai

"Any thoughts?"


Nope. Not one. You have succinctly explained the whole mystery.

Haha that just made me spit out my drink.

Take the results of a study of Czechoslovakian children whose fathers were first-degree relatives of their mothers. Fewer than half the children who were products of incestuous unions were completely healthy. Forty-two percent of them were born with severe birth defects or suffered early death, and another 11 percent were mildly mentally impaired. This study is particularly instructive, as it included a unique control group: offspring of the same mothers but whose fathers were not the mothers’ relatives. When the same women were impregnated by a non-relative, only 7 percent of their children were born with a birth defect.

www.huffingtonpost.com...

originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes


What are the chances that within the next 1000 years or less. It would be possible for all peoples due to constraints in precreation across race, creed or color becoming related to that point?

What sort of constraints? We are all related, of course - descendants of Noah and his sons - but we aren't as close as first cousins.

a reply to: LadyGreenEyes


Can you prove that we are all descendants of Noah?

And if we are not what would that mean to you? How would you explain to me why I am wrong if I took the opposing position that you were wrong?

Lets debate

originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes


Can you prove that we are all descendants of Noah?

And if we are not what would that mean to you? How would you explain to me why I am wrong if I took the opposing position that you were wrong?

Lets debate

I can't begin to talk about proving you wrong or right, because you have yet to state the things you claied you would state in the OP. Still waiting for your ideas here. Or, not. Plenty of other threads.

a reply to: LadyGreenEyes


Bull#. You stated we are all descendants of Noah so can you prove that???

And can you elaborate as to why I should agree with you?

a reply to: Kashai

Done here. Pointless thread.

a reply to: LadyGreenEyes


What was pointless was your input.


Any thoughts?