New TRUMP Weapons

I do not own a gun but I do think this is interesting and a bit comical.







That selector switch on the AR-15

-Chris

I suppose there are worse things to deface your firearms with.

Hey, why not? Everything is marketable. It is comical though.
a reply to: Blue_Jay33

Does this redefine the phrase:


" To Trump something up"?

a reply to: Blue_Jay33

i am always an advocate of substance over style - so what is the actual point of the top weapon - what does it actually acieve that other firearms in its class do not ?

that said - i do realise and accept that some people collect fireams as " objects d art " - that they never fire - just display for aesthetic qualities - and can see that the gold plated 45 auto may be of interest to some collectors

but the top one - just WTF ????

I am going to take a guess and say that handle on the AR-15 might not be that comfortable, but owners of those types of guns, can let us know.

a reply to: Blue_Jay33

Sorry, it is too early to start to do this sort of thing.

a reply to: ignorant_ape

I think some would consider this a "Show off" weapon, if I could afford it I would buy one for my Father, with only one minor change, the pistol grip should have a gold inset for the Trump cutout

Meanwhile at Obama's...

I like the gold one, Trump 45 that is a beauty, will be a nice item for collection.

The perfect weapon for shooting yourself in the foot.

a reply to: Blue_Jay33

Oh, that is some nice display eye candy!

The .45 would be great in a case.

wait those are real?
seriously

I'll stick with my original issue 1933 government 1911-A1 Colt .45 ACP.
And it has been known to cure every malady known to the human species.

This also the antique that was invoked in THE Ali AkBOOM incident.
For some strange reason ole boy just didn't have time to get out the BAR.

bUCK

originally posted by: infolurker
a reply to: Blue_Jay33

Oh, that is some nice display eye candy!

The .45 would be great in a case.

I know right!

Nice piece for displace only.

I've never seen a firearm I didn't want. Until today.

a reply to: marg6043
This statement by John F.Kennedy will make Progressives scream. He had some pretties as well.

"By calling attention to a well-regulated militia for the security of the Nation, and the right of each citizen to keep and bear arms, our founding fathers recognized the essentially civilian nature of our economy. Although it is extremely unlikely that the fear of governmental tyranny, which gave rise to the 2nd amendment, will ever be a major danger to our Nation, the amendment still remains an important declaration of our basic military-civilian relationship, in which every citizen must be ready to participate in the defense of his country. For that reason I believe the 2nd Amendment will always be important."

JOHN F. KENNEDY

originally posted by: underwerks
I've never seen a firearm I didn't want. Until today.

The AR looks cheesy. The .45 is sweet!

a reply to: infolurker

I know, we do have some serious pro second amendment supporters from the older and more traditional camp within the Democratic party.

But the danger is not the American people that had been breed and raise to understand what our constitution means and to be faithful to their countries ideologies as their family values has teach them.

The danger comes to the foreign influences that has taken over the country in the last 10 years that have no reason to be faithful to our countries constitutional rights or ideologies, but that their purpose is not influence politics in order to make change and no for the better.