It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
There's apparently been some confusion: we're not reserving slices here.
Everybody gets one slice, according to their needs, just as the glorious
tenets of Marxism would tell us.
Chris Douglas wrote:
> Headcount!
>
> Who all is in the Austin office today who is going to want pizza? We
> only have one slice and we need to know how thinly to slice it...
>
> Simply send a single response, filed, color-coded, double-sided and
> appropriately labeled, signed in triplicate and set on fire.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: TheFlyOnTheWall
Reads to me like an inner-circle joke.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: TheFlyOnTheWall
Reads to me like an inner-circle joke.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: TheFlyOnTheWall
Reads to me like an inner-circle joke.
originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: TheFlyOnTheWall
Are you sure your email ID# is correct. Is that one of the Podesta emails?
From:[email protected]
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] more
Date: 2009-08-08 00:20
Subject: pizza.jpg
As John said, it doesn't get any better than this
So who are the two women in the picture of the little girl, with the pizza?
They were Laura Ling and Euna Lee who were arrested in North Korea while reporting on sex trafficking. They were freed and must have taken this picture. But how come the second we get away from sex trafficking we are right back to it?
This links the phrase “pizza” with child sex trafficking through their own emails.
originally posted by: TheFlyOnTheWall
a reply to: BlueShaman
Yeah saw this. And those two so happened to be "reporting" on trafficking too. How many coincidences do we need? Either we're all #ed in the head and Podesta and the whole crew are absolutely obsessed about pizza or we're on to something.
originally posted by: TheFlyOnTheWall
a reply to: BlueShaman
Yeah saw this. And those two so happened to be "reporting" on trafficking too. How many coincidences do we need? Either we're all #ed in the head and Podesta and the whole crew are absolutely obsessed about pizza or we're on to something.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: TheFlyOnTheWall
Reads to me like an inner-circle joke.
originally posted by: BlueShaman
Here's another suspicious pizza email (ID 10037):
From:[email protected]
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] more
Date: 2009-08-08 00:20
Subject: pizza.jpg
As John said, it doesn't get any better than this
And here is the attached image:
Does anyone else get the impression that when he says "it doesn't get any better than this" he's referring to the child in the photo?
A reverse image search turned up this page:
So who are the two women in the picture of the little girl, with the pizza?
They were Laura Ling and Euna Lee who were arrested in North Korea while reporting on sex trafficking. They were freed and must have taken this picture. But how come the second we get away from sex trafficking we are right back to it?
This links the phrase “pizza” with child sex trafficking through their own emails.
Case closed on what pizza means?
originally posted by: BlueShaman
originally posted by: TheFlyOnTheWall
a reply to: BlueShaman
Yeah saw this. And those two so happened to be "reporting" on trafficking too. How many coincidences do we need? Either we're all #ed in the head and Podesta and the whole crew are absolutely obsessed about pizza or we're on to something.
I think they are partly obsessed with real pizza. The reason why he said it didn't get any better than that was because in that photo there's a pizza eating pizza.
originally posted by: projectvxn
I'm not sure how I feel about this.
I spent about 30 minutes last night searching through all of the listed keywords for these email strings.
If you think in context of child sex trafficking this kind of code makes sense.
However the skeptic in me says that just because it makes sense doesn't mean that's what they are talking about.