It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: carewemust
How accurate was Monmouth in 2008/2010/2012/2014? A poll's historical accuracy is what we need to know first and foremost.
originally posted by: MysticPearl
2012:
2.9M democrats and 2.6M republicans voted
originally posted by: UnBreakable
originally posted by: kruphix
originally posted by: FlyingFox
originally posted by: kruphix
originally posted by: FlyingFox
originally posted by: kruphix
originally posted by: FlyingFox
I'm in PA, and I can tell you for a fact that Trump yard signs outnumber Hillary by 500:0, how's that for a poll?
Anecdotal evidence is not very good for a poll.
but it's not anecdotal, it's observational.
Yes, observational is most of the time anecdotal.
www.dictionary.com...
based on personal observation, case study reports, or random investigations rather than systematic scientific evaluation: anecdotal evidence.
Why dismiss it?
It could also be a fact.
I dismiss it because we have other measures that were scientifically conducted.
Trump is losing in PA...I don't care how many signs you see.
Please do tell the statistics and metrics used in the scientifically conducted polls..............like disqualifying middle age white males from taking part?
originally posted by: kruphix
originally posted by: UnBreakable
originally posted by: kruphix
originally posted by: FlyingFox
originally posted by: kruphix
originally posted by: FlyingFox
originally posted by: kruphix
originally posted by: FlyingFox
I'm in PA, and I can tell you for a fact that Trump yard signs outnumber Hillary by 500:0, how's that for a poll?
Anecdotal evidence is not very good for a poll.
but it's not anecdotal, it's observational.
Yes, observational is most of the time anecdotal.
www.dictionary.com...
based on personal observation, case study reports, or random investigations rather than systematic scientific evaluation: anecdotal evidence.
Why dismiss it?
It could also be a fact.
I dismiss it because we have other measures that were scientifically conducted.
Trump is losing in PA...I don't care how many signs you see.
Please do tell the statistics and metrics used in the scientifically conducted polls..............like disqualifying middle age white males from taking part?
Do you have proof they disqualify middle age white males?