It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: mrthumpy
If this isn't a ruse by another pundit, then yes. There have been threads here about some 'xyz' agency starting the chemtrail conspiracy, somewhere, I think. Both sides being fomented to distract from the real question of sullied skies overhead.
Anyone can look up and see the miasma, any real investigation is quickly sidelined by either 'camp'.
I really don't see why you get upset about the contrail 'camp' pointing out that what we're seeing is very real and a result of the exhaust products from aircraft engines burning tonnes of kerosene an hour.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: mrthumpy
So it was a ruse.
I really don't see why you get upset about the contrail 'camp' pointing out that what we're seeing is very real and a result of the exhaust products from aircraft engines burning tonnes of kerosene an hour.
I'm not the one that gets 'upset'.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Orionx2
Just like any engine from a car, truck, train, motorcycle,
Actually the requirements for pollution are higher for surface vehicles. There are no exhaust emission devices or catalytic converters on jet engines, on the ground taxing, take off, landing or cruising hi altitude.
The pollutants that are in the exhaust of a plane are virtually invisible.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Orionx2
Seriously? Isn't there an entire forum here dedicated to this? Our are you just being obtuse to start arguments?
Blah, blah, the whole debate is a red herring. 'Only water' and 'mystery spraying' are fabricated lies.
originally posted by: Bleeeeep
a reply to: tsurfer2000h
You burn a tonne of kerosene and get 3.15 tonnes of co2?
That seems like a lot of if right.
originally posted by: Bleeeeep
a reply to: tsurfer2000h
More, after a tiny bit of research, I think what must be adding to the co2 emission for jet fuel is that they're using both kerosene and liquid oxygen, and as a result of forcing the mixture, the emission is higher than typical kerosene usage. (Typical household usage is much nearer gasoline emissions, I think.)
originally posted by: [post=21077193]mrthumpy[/post
Not a ruse at all. SOMEBODY must have started the hoax and it really does distract attention from the very real problems caused by burning tonnes of kerosene.
originally posted by: AndyMayhew
originally posted by: [post=21077193]mrthumpy[/post
Not a ruse at all. SOMEBODY must have started the hoax and it really does distract attention from the very real problems caused by burning tonnes of kerosene.
I have long speculated (with no evidence!) that it was am experiment. "Chemtrails" appeared just as the WWW was getting going. So someone decided to see how the WWW could be used to spread misinformation. And came up with a totally ridiculous conspiracy to try and spread and see what happens. And it went viral .....
originally posted by: AndyMayhew
originally posted by: [post=21077193]mrthumpy[/post
Not a ruse at all. SOMEBODY must have started the hoax and it really does distract attention from the very real problems caused by burning tonnes of kerosene.
I have long speculated (with no evidence!) that it was am experiment. "Chemtrails" appeared just as the WWW was getting going. So someone decided to see how the WWW could be used to spread misinformation. And came up with a totally ridiculous conspiracy to try and spread and see what happens. And it went viral .....