It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
From the CMB data it is seen that our local group of galaxies (the galactic cluster that includes the Solar System's Milky Way Galaxy) appears to be moving at 627±22 km/s relative to the reference frame of the CMB
So you can say 371 km/s but of course there are smaller wiggling motions that pale in comparison such as the others you mentioned. For example the speed of the Earth's orbit around the sun is less than 1/10 of that, averaging just under 30 km/s. Speed due to Earth's rotation is faster than most airplanes but very slow relative to those and depends on latitude.
the peculiar velocity of the Earth relative to the comoving cosmic rest frame as the planet moves at some 371 km/s
A naive extrapolation of what happens just under the speed of light to the speed of light might suggest that at first, but on closer examination we find this extrapolation to be flawed.
originally posted by: arpgme
a reply to: Arbitrageur
So, the faster you go the closer things appear to be to you?
Since moving near the speed of light would make a planet seem closer than just moving 10, 000 miles per hour, then maybe at light speed when time stops... there is no distance and it is everything is all one as Light?
This is why we can see further back in time the further and deeper we look into space.
originally posted by: new_here
a reply to: Arbitrageur
Thanks, I've also thought about the fact that, as the Earth orbits the Sun, half of the year it is moving opposite (retrograde?) the direction that the Solar System is traveling, so the relative speed of the Earth-to-Galaxy must change 4 times in a year. Like, say, the Milky Way and Solar System progressing in one direction, but the Earth is going the opposite direction at one point as it traverses the Sun. Then it goes "lateral" before it whips around the Sun to play 'catch up' and actually must travel faster than the Sun to continue its orbit. Am I seeing this right in my head, lol?
Fascinating to think about... space, time, relative velocity, and how its experienced from various reference points. The Earth IS the center of the Universe, and everything DOES moves around it... when you name it the point of reference! Because in Space, everything is moving relative to everything else. We'd have to step outside of the Universe to see if there was anything completely anchored, immobile. Right?
I just made my brain hurt.
originally posted by: JameSimon
a reply to: arpgme
The theory of general relativity only applies to objects with mass
and Photons have got no mass.
originally posted by: mbkennel
originally posted by: JameSimon
a reply to: arpgme
The theory of general relativity only applies to objects with mass
Not true.
After all, one of the most important early experimental tests of general relativity was starlight deflection, a.k.a. gravitational lensing of light.
and Photons have got no mass.
True.
The force of gravity affects both light and all material bodies; since both carry energy, but only the bodies carry mass, it follows that gravity will affect anything carrying energy. This conclusion lies at the root of the construction of Einstein's equations which describe gravity.
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
A photon doesn't need mass for gravity to affect it.
originally posted by: DaRAGE
From an observers point of view, Time slows down around things of mass. The more mass, the more time appears to slow down. Objects gain mass the faster they go. Have an object of mass travelling close to the speed of light and they would gain huge amounts of mass and gravity. The more time would slow around them.
Photons have no mass.
No mass, No Gravity.
Time would appear normal around them.
No time dilation.