a reply to:
douglas5
I agree free speech has to be defended, the politicians are jumping on the band wagon which in the UK has a long history, Thatcher started this 30
years or so ago following the terrible heysal stadium riot she blamed the Liverpool FC fans' when in fact the evidence later showed that a hard line
element among the Juventus fan's had actually fired a starter pistol at the Liverpool fans' this prompted angry fathers who thought the gun was real
as well as other fan's to stand up in anger and trouble ensued between the two side's.
Thatcher nevertheless blamed the English side and the Liverpool fan's using it to justify more draconian crowd control law's and regulation's in the
UK even though the riot happened abroad, she likewise made it harder for people to protest and to assemble without a permission in massed group's thus
paving the way for a form of civil martial law and suppressing freedom of speech in the UK.
Later government did not reverse these unjust and anti civil measures and indeed in some cases actually have since expanded upon them, in fact it has
been made all the harder as without free assembly and speech the British public are like sheep being fed only what information from official and
controlled news sources that the PTB want they to hear with alternative line's of information denigrated or else made out to be in some way biased
while in fact it is obviously the truth that the source of this denigration is the real biased party.
If any one of us think's that any of us with less than seven zero's before the decimal point in our bank's live in a free world and a fair society
then we are obviously of a low intellectual capacity.
The Internet will be censored and in fact it is already to a very large extent, though I am no fan of piracy the event's which pirate bay suffered
are a prime example and are in part due to the fact that in a country (Sweden) that was once one of the most freedom loving liberal society's in the
world with one of the highest living standards but is now swaying to the far right with that society dividing under pressure from mass Islamic
migration who only over the past 30 years have gone from less than one percent to over 4 percent and is projected to rise as high as 20 percent in the
next 20 years of it's population and the abuse of there welfare system by these and other immigrant's Sweden is teetering on the brink of becoming a
class based right wing nation, reversing these policy's that were never intended for migrant's but for there own people and polarized more and more to
the extreme right as growing resentment among native swede's is capitalized on by there right wing minority extremists and right wing government
element's.
This next article show's how the same propaganda machine can be used in reverse to hide the inconvenient truth or serious matter's.
Caution this site may be a biased and even politically right wing fascist site so take with a shovel of salt and see if you can verify these stats on
the web.
www.frontpagemag.com...
The causes are many and this is a growing pan European and American problem which is being used by these right wing power mongering element's to set
us against one another and gain credibility for there rather evil minded and vile policy's.
What are we going to do about it, curl up in a quiet corner and die as we are obviously incapable of organising and fighting for our right's against
these fascist scum.
As for the specific Jewish statement it is a simple fact that we in Britain may crack a joke about jewish and being part Jewish myself I know it was
just that, people skit what is different to themselves and there normal social tribal grouping but ever since we opened our borders a much stronger
and viler form of anti Semitism has seeped across partially from eastern Europe and partially from the Islamic community.
Jews are people, they have a different religion, a different private social culture among themselves, a polarized view of Israel with some Jew's
flatly refusing to recognize it as they believe the new Israel will be established only when the messiah come's (Which is exactly the Christian
version from the book of revelation with the second coming though they do not accept jesus as they are still waiting for the messiah), while other's
remember how there people were despised and made scapegoats' of with no national identity to protect them and as a displaced people having to rely
upon what ever nation they were in to look after there interests while seeing themselves and being seen as a separate people in those nation's so
regard Israel as a necessary entity for there own survival no matter where they are in the world.
So I walk down the street in the 70's, two people walk past and a question is asked by one to the other, are you catholic or are you protestant, the
answer result's in a fight.
Now are the government merely seeking to capitalize in order to place more control on us, Yes they most certainly are.
A lesson from history, if you suppress freedom of speech you make it more popular and it's adherent's more aggressive eventually bringing the system
that imposed these restriction's and it's entrenched power mongers down so maybe in the long run what they are doing is actually a good thing as the
straw that broke the camel's back will surely come back to haunt these hypocritical right wing B"!£$rds.
Remember this a politician is not your friend, most are in it only for themselves and there policys reflect this no matter what country you are in,
as the world is made more open for there benefit we are exposed to a larger and more diverse world but the downside is that systems once put in place
for our own people's are then exploied by opportunistic immigration which it then used as propaganda by those who wish to remove these very systems to
cut tax for there less than one percent anti nationalist internationalist corporate gangsters who fund there political careers behind the scene's.
Even when freedom of speech has undesired element's it is essential that it be kept open for all as a pressure release valve and a method of public
debate, suppressed speech fester's and turn's into hatred and of course hatred is one of the root causes of extremism while another is a society that
is not strictured enough to protect itself against outside influence.
The paradox of this is that freedom of speech is essential but also some level of censorship is essential, the problem who is censoring and what are
they censoring, what is there agenda and is it truly for the public good or more likely for there good of vested interests, interests who probably do
not have our well being at the heart of there hidden agenda.
edit on 9-2-2015 by LABTECH767 because: (no reason given)