It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: macman
Brown attacked a LEO. He was shot as he attacked the LEO. End of story.
originally posted by: Greven
originally posted by: macman
Brown attacked a LEO. He was shot as he attacked the LEO. End of story.
According to the LEO who shot him.
The one who was so injured that he went back to the police department at some point after the shooting, before leaving for the hospital two hours after the shooting, where he wasn't even kept because he wasn't really injured.
Totally unbiased source, that.
originally posted by: chuck258
Yep, and Anonymous is TOTALLY un biased as well. Yep, a self proclaimed criminal group, which has been proven to commit crimes and has had members sent to prison for their actions has ZERO AGENDA. Get over yourself. The reason Wilson's story holds some sore of water is because his story was consistently consistent and also lined up with a majority of other stories, some of whom CAME FROM BLACK PEOPLE JUST LIKE MICHAEL BROWN.
Refer to my above post that talks just about Anonymous credibility.
Wilson testified before the grand jury, according to transcripts released Monday night, that before he fired, the teenager slammed the door of his police cruiser on him, prompting him to draw his gun. "I said, 'Get back or I'm going to shoot you,' " Wilson testified.” He immediately grabs my gun and says, 'You are too much of a pussy to shoot me.'"
Ms. Alizadeh: Probable cause to believe that he committed the offense, which means that he met all elements of that offense. You remember that from your grand jury days. And you must find probable cause to believe that Darren Wilson did not act in lawful self-defense and you must find probable cause to believe that Darren Wilson did not use lawful force in making an arrest. And only if you find those things, which is kind of like finding a negative, you cannot return an indictment on anything or true bill unless you find both of those things. Because both are complete defenses to any offense and they both have been raised in his, in the evidence. So any other questions about the law?