It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
CHICAGO, Oct 3 (Reuters) - Nurses, the frontline care providers in U.S. hospitals, say they are untrained and unprepared to handle patients arriving in their hospital emergency departments infected with Ebola. Many say they have gone to hospital managers, seeking training on how to best care for patients and protect themselves and their families from contracting the deadly disease, which has so far killed at least 3,338 people in the deadliest outbreak on record.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has repeatedly said that U.S. hospitals are prepared to handle such patients. Many infectious disease experts agree with that assessment. Dr. Edward Goodman, an infectious disease doctor at Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital in Dallas that is now caring for the first Ebola patient to be diagnosed in this country, believed his hospital was ready.
The hospital had completed Ebola training just before Thomas Eric Duncan arrived in their emergency department on Sept. 26. But despite being told that Duncan had recently traveled from Liberia, hospital staff failed to recognize the Ebola risk and sent him home, where he spent another two days becoming sicker and more infectious. "The Texas case is a perfect example," said Micker Samios, a triage nurse in the emergency department at Medstar Washington Hospital Center, the largest hospital in the nation's capital. "In addition to not being prepared, there was a flaw in diagnostics as well as communication," Samios said.
Nurses argue that inadequate preparation could increase the chances of spreading Ebola if hospital staff fail to recognize a patient coming through their doors, or if personnel are not informed about how to properly protect themselves. At Medstar, the issue of Ebola training came up at the bargaining table during contract negotiations. "A lot of staff feel they aren't adequately trained," said Samios, whose job is to greet patients in the emergency department and do an initial assessment of their condition.
originally posted by: ItCameFromOuterSpace
a reply to: lovebeck
Just make sure they don't puke or bleed on you.
It can't be that hard.
originally posted by: ItCameFromOuterSpace
a reply to: lovebeck
Just make sure they don't puke or bleed on you.
It can't be that hard.
originally posted by: ItCameFromOuterSpace
a reply to: lovebeck
Just make sure they don't puke or bleed on you.
It can't be that hard.
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: ItCameFromOuterSpace
a reply to: lovebeck
Just make sure they don't puke or bleed on you.
It can't be that hard.
lolz
Ask any nurse and she/he will say that poop/puke/pee is the cologne of the nursing industry.
originally posted by: tinker9917
a reply to: lovebeck
I don't blame you for thinking this way. I would not do it either, putting my whole family at risk.
But, this leaves the questions... who WILL do it? How many will just be left uncared for? Sent home to die, just like in Africa?
originally posted by: ItCameFromOuterSpace
a reply to: lovebeck
Just make sure they don't puke or bleed on you.
It can't be that hard.
originally posted by: Stormdancer777
a reply to: lovebeck
I agree, because my nurse friend, when I mentioned Ebola to her said,
Who?