former ferguson policewoman who charged man for bleeding on her now on city council

all i can say, is wow! says a lot about this community if she was elected. now that her past is now out, wonder if she will keep her seat? you think this would have affected her decisions on the council?

www.huffingtonpost.com...

this is in reference to this previous thread-

www.abovetopsecret.com...

a reply to: blackthorne

At a deposition, Ferguson's former police chief revealed that his staff did not keep records of incidents in which officers used force against citizens, so long as no one died; in other words, there was no way of telling how often incidents like Davis' happened. Surveillance video of the jail was destroyed before the trial. Davis pleaded guilty to two of the four destruction-of-property counts and a handful of traffic violations. He paid $3,000 in damages. He also sued the officers, in a case that was dismissed but is being appealed.

They do sound like a crooked bunch of cops, its no wonder there's so much trouble in feguson.

a reply to: VoidHawk

gee, you think this police department has a history of destroying and covering up evidence? maybe they are still engaging in these activities in some, oh, i don't know, current cases?

A majority of the voters elected her so they obviously approved of what she did or they didn`t bother to find out who they were really voting for.

So blood doesn't ever contain the AIDS virus? It could have been attempted murder. There's a reason doctors and nurses wear eye shields and gloves. They don't want to become accidentally infected. Not to mention other blood borne illnesses. There had to be a motive for the Perp to want to bleed on someone.

originally posted by: AutumnWitch657
So blood doesn't ever contain the AIDS virus? It could have been attempted murder. There's a reason doctors and nurses wear eye shields and gloves. They don't want to become accidentally infected. Not to mention other blood borne illnesses. There had to be a motive for the Perp to want to bleed on someone.

They were wrong to arrest the guy, then when a leo picked him up she got blood on her uniform. He didn't put the blood there! The only thing he was busted for was the blood!!
Did you even bother read the article?

a reply to: VoidHawk
It's not just Ferguson. As I said in a previous thread. St. Louis is home to some of the most corrupt cops in the country. Especially St. Louis County Police. St. Louis will always be home to me, but I wouldn't want to live there again.

On a different note. Anyone who hasn't seen the hunger games, should watch it. The attitude of the upper crust in that film is very representative of not just the elitists of our world, but the politicians, and a lot of cops too.

originally posted by: AutumnWitch657
So blood doesn't ever contain the AIDS virus? It could have been attempted murder. There's a reason doctors and nurses wear eye shields and gloves. They don't want to become accidentally infected. Not to mention other blood borne illnesses. There had to be a motive for the Perp to want to bleed on someone.

Or you know, they could have not abused him. how dare he get his blood on them while they pound the authority into him

a reply to: Klassified
Hunger games, movie or tv ?

originally posted by: VoidHawk
a reply to: Klassified
Hunger games, movie or tv ?

Movie for sure. There are some scenes in there only an ATSer would catch. Very dystopian.

i have a question in regards to the current case. and it is relevant to my thread. in this case, the police had security cameras inside the station that captured their abuse of this man. then, strangely, the video was "accidentally" destroyed. now we have established they destroy evidence. now, with this in mind, are their cruisers equipped with dash cams? and if so, where is the video of from michael brown?

originally posted by: Klassified

originally posted by: VoidHawk
a reply to: Klassified
Hunger games, movie or tv ?

Movie for sure. There are some scenes in there only an ATSer would catch.

Very dystopian.

Thanks