It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: menneni
Hello guys,
just posting couple of shots i took while i had the "trail-frenzy" going on highest levels.
Enjoy.
just pure awesomeness ^^ (IS IT NOT?!?)
originally posted by: Soylent Green Is People
originally posted by: br0ker
In reply to the OP. I don't see the point of your post. Both the government AND military personel has admitted spraying. China even admitted using one type to create clear skies during the Olympics. So what do you want to give people proof of that hasn't already been proven?
You're talking about cloud seeding, which is a decades-old technology (has been openly done since the 1950s) that uses small planes at low altitudes. Cloud seeding is what farmers do in times of drier weather in order to (hopefully) coax rain out of pre-existing moisture-laden low altitude clouds. I can see military applications as well.
However, this is NOT what people mean when they say "chemtrails" or contrails. Contrails (what some people call chemtrails) are made at high altitude, are are created due to the effect the hot wet exhaust of a jet engine can have on the surrounding atmosphere under certain conditions.
Cloud seeding is not the thing discussed in the contrails/chemtrail debate.
My whistleblowing is not related to chemtrails, it is related to industrial ground activities that overexposed the workers and they didn't want it reported, and since I took the samples, they wanted to demonize me in case I spoke out.
It is going through what I did as a whistleblower than led to my activism. Chemtrails and the TSA are my biggest topics I am linked to.
originally posted by: seabhac-rua
Let me remind you that chemtrail conspiracy theorists only recently(the last 5/6 yrs) adopted the 'geo-engineering' angle.
originally posted by: seabhac-rua
From my experience the majority of people who invest their lives in a lot of this stuff are typically unstable individuals, to varying degrees.
originally posted by: seabhac-rua
Some of these people are nice and peaceful, some are vulnerable and distressed, and some are f**king nut-cases who, if they could, would actually shoot down a jet they thought was 'spraying'.
originally posted by: menneni
a reply to: waynos
Could somebody tell me how/what this is about:
My neighbor is a aviation engineer, teaching the stuff. I asked about those kind of contrails from him, i suggested that maybe those are some sort of economical flightmodes, sort of. He did not know anything about if that kind of motors existed.
I find those fancy! Like a choo-choo-train! Seems like pulse-motor, hence the economical flight-idea.
OK, thanks for clearing that up for me. Apparently i've been just too lazy to ever look for explanation of those.
Aviation is fascinating!
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: ~Lucidity
If you believe the stuff in your link, then I have a way to at least prove to you, that contrails are just that.
Are you willing to test my theory, or are you afraid it might damage your ego?
originally posted by: AlphaHawk
a reply to: ~Lucidity
Two links?
The first is a timeline made after the fact and the other is about Fluoranthene used in naval exercises.
You may have connected geo-engineering with chemtrails, but you are amongst a small few.
Like the chemtrailers believe that there were never trails before the 90's, I don't recall ever seeing geo-engineering being mentioned with chemtrails back when I was young and stupid thinking chemtrails were a thing, both are anecdotal, but fortunately contrails can be proven to exist well before the 90's, whereas linking chemtrails and geo engineering, as shown by your "proof" cannot.
Happy to be proven wrong though!
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: ~Lucidity
If you believe the stuff in your link, then I have a way to at least prove to you, that contrails are just that.
Are you willing to test my theory, or are you afraid it might damage your ego?
I have no ego.
I also don't need to see your stuff for the 1000th time, but thanks.