It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Ex-CIA Pilot gives sworn testimony that no planes hit world trade towers (john Lear)

page: 2
5
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 5 2014 @ 03:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: Zaphod58
Too bad the building is actually in front of the Tower, not behind.

www.checktheevidence.co.uk...


I figured as much. Not really what I found interesting. I thought it was interesting what the area around the building in question looks like as the plane passes by. Lot's of artifacts but I suppose it could be the resolution?



posted on Jun, 5 2014 @ 07:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: boncho
You guys are posting that the CIA Is trying to kill you using fembot Tila Tequila in one thread, but suddenly an ex agent is rock solid witness for what you want to hear in the next.

Makes sense.



Wait shes not? What?



posted on Jun, 5 2014 @ 12:33 PM
link   
Lol

Well.. John Lear has definitely well and truly lost the plot

Probably one of the most insane Thing he's ever said

Up is down etc etc



posted on Jun, 5 2014 @ 12:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: Zaphod58
Too bad the building is actually in front of the Tower, not behind.

www.checktheevidence.co.uk...



It's to late that video has already sucked in another 100k idiots for the anti west/US cause



posted on Jun, 8 2014 @ 11:01 AM
link   

originally posted by: boomer135
OK. Its John Lear. But if this is an actual video of the second plane hitting the world trade center tower then what else is fake about the entire day? We all know he's not the most popular guy in the conspiracy world (or maybe a god to some) but this is rather interesting to say the least. I'm just assuming that he's after his fifteen minutes again...


Come on.... this is/was Bob Lazars pal.
Trying to outdo each other with kooky outlandish tales. Not sure who won.



posted on Jun, 9 2014 @ 12:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: Zaphod58
Too bad the building is actually in front of the Tower, not behind.

www.checktheevidence.co.uk...


I love the way this guy says "a building that is 'clearly' behind the tower", as if emphasizing "clearly" makes what he is saying more true.

I mean, this guy is either an idiot or an intentional liar, because before making such a claim, he should have investigated his claim. If he didn't, then he is an idiot. If he did, he would have certainly seen that the building in question is in the foreground, which then makes him a liar.


edit on 6/9/2014 by Soylent Green Is People because: (no reason given)




top topics
 
5
<< 1   >>

log in

join